2023 French recommendations for diagnosing and managing prepatellar and olecranon septic bursitis.

Septic bursitis (SB) is a common condition accounting for one third of all cases of inflammatory bursitis. It is often related to professional activities. Management is heterogeneous and either ambulatory or hospital-based, with no recommendations available. This article presents recommendations for managing patients with septic bursitis gathered by 18 rheumatologists from the French Society for Rheumatology work group on bone and joint infections, 1 infectious diseases specialist, 2 orthopedic surgeons, 1 general practitioner and 1 emergency physician. This group used a literature review and expert opinions to establish 3 general principles and 11 recommendations for managing olecranon and prepatellar SB. The French Health authority (Haute Autorité de santé [HAS]) methodology was used for these recommendations. Designed for rheumatologists, general practitioners, emergency physicians and orthopedic surgeons, they focus on the use of biological tests and imaging in both outpatient and inpatient management. Antibiotic treatment options (drugs and duration) are proposed for both treatment modalities. Finally, surgical indications, non-drug treatments and prevention are covered by specific recommendations.

Factors associated with COVID-19 severity in patients with spondyloarthritis: Results of the French RMD COVID-19 cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the severity of COVID-19 and identify factors associated with severe disease outcomes in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), a chronic inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMD). METHODS: We utilized patient data from the French national multicenter RMD COVID-19 cohort (NCT04353609). The primary outcome was to describe COVID-19 characteristics in patients with SpA based on disease severity of COVID-19 (mild, moderate or severe) with serious infection including moderate and severe cases. The secondary outcome was to identify the factors associated with serious COVID-19 classification. RESULTS: Among the 626 patients with SpA (56% female, mean age 49±14 years) from the French RMD cohort, COVID-19 severity was mild in 508 (81%), moderate in 93 (15%), and severe in 25 (4%) patients. Clinical signs and symptoms of COVID-19 were reported in 587 (94%) patients, with the most frequent presented symptom of fever (63%) and cough (62%), followed by flu-like symptoms (53%), agueusia (39%), anosmia (37%), dyspnea (32%) and diarrhea (19.9%). COVID-19 severity was associated with corticosteroid therapy (OR=3.08 [95% CI: 1.44-6.58], P=0.004) and age (OR=1.06 [95% CI: 1.04-1.08], P<0.001) while use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi, OR=0.27 [95% CI: 0.09-0.78], P=0.01) was associated with less severe disease. We did not identify an association between NSAID use and COVID-19 severity. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the majority of patients with SpA had a favorable COVID-19 outcome. We confirmed age and corticosteroids therapy had a negative impact on disease outcomes while TNFi use was protective.

CovAID: Identification of factors associated with severe COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory rheumatism or autoimmune diseases.

Introduction: Autoimmune/inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) patients might be at-risk of severe COVID-19. However, whether this is linked to the disease or to its treatment is difficult to determine. This study aimed to identify factors associated with occurrence of severe COVID-19 in AIRD patients and to evaluate whether having an AIRD was associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19 or death. Materials and methods: Two databases were analyzed: the EDS (Entrepôt des Données de Santé, Clinical Data Warehouse), including all patients followed in Paris university hospitals and the French multi-center COVID-19 cohort [French rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD)]. First, in a combined analysis we compared patients with severe and non-severe COVID-19 to identify factors associated with severity. Then, we performed a propensity matched score case-control study within the EDS database to compare AIRD cases and non-AIRD controls. Results: Among 1,213 patients, 195 (16.1%) experienced severe COVID-19. In multivariate analysis, older age, interstitial lung disease (ILD), arterial hypertension, obesity, sarcoidosis, vasculitis, auto-inflammatory diseases, and treatment with corticosteroids or rituximab were associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19. Among 35,741 COVID-19 patients in EDS, 316 having AIRDs were compared to 1,264 Propensity score-matched controls. AIRD patients had a higher risk of severe COVID-19 [aOR = 1.43 (1.08-1.87), p = 0.01] but analysis restricted to rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis found no increased risk of severe COVID-19 [aOR = 1.11 (0.68-1.81)]. Conclusion: In this multicenter study, we confirmed that AIRD patients treated with rituximab or corticosteroids and/or having vasculitis, auto-inflammatory disease, and sarcoidosis had increased risk of severe COVID-19. Also, AIRD patients had, overall, an increased risk of severe COVID-19 compares general population.

COVID-19 infection among patients with autoinflammatory diseases: a study on 117 French patients compared with 1545 from the French RMD COVID-19 cohort: COVIMAI - the French cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patient with systemic autoinflammatory diseases.

OBJECTIVE: There is little known about SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with systemic autoinflammatory disease (SAID). This study aimed to describe epidemiological features associated with severe disease form and death. Mortality between patients with and without SAID hospitalised for SARS-CoV-2 infection was compared. METHODS: A national multicentric prospective cohort study was conducted from the French Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (RMD) COVID-19 cohort. Patients with SAID were matched with patients with non-SAID on age±7 years, gender and number of comorbidities to consider important confounding factors. Impact of SAID on severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection was analysed using multinomial logistic regression for severity in three classes (mild, moderate and severe with mild status as reference). Fine-Gray regression model for length of hospital stay and binomial logistic regression model for risk of death at 30 days. RESULTS: We identified 117 patients with SAID (sex ratio 0.84, 17 children) and compared them with 1545 patients with non-autoinflammatory immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (non-SAID). 67 patients had a monogenic SAID (64 with familial Mediterranean fever). Other SAIDs were Behçet' disease (n=21), undifferentiated SAID (n=16), adult-onset Still disease (n=9) and systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (n=5). Ten adults developed severe form (8.6%). Six patients died. All children had a benign disease. After matching on age±7 years, sex and number of comorbidities, no significant difference between the two groups in length of stay and the severity of infection was noted. CONCLUSION: As identified in the whole French RMD COVID-19 cohort, patients with SAID on corticosteroids and with multiple comorbidities are prone to develop more severe COVID-19 forms.

Arthroplasty after septic arthritis of the native hip and knee: retrospective analysis of 49 joints.

Background: Arthroplasty after septic arthritis (SA) treatment raises diagnostic and therapeutic questions. The main objective was to evaluate infection-free survival of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) post-SA. Other objectives were to describe the population's characteristics, surgical strategies, results of preoperative examinations and cultures of intraoperative samples taken at implantation, and postoperative antibiotic therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational, monocenter study, from January 2005 to May 2019, including all patients undergoing TKA or THA with prior or ongoing SA in the same joint. Infection-free survival was analyzed and reported. Results: Forty-seven patients, 29 men, 49 joints operated on (30 knees, 19 hips), were included. Median SA-to-arthroplasty interval was 32 [1-216] weeks. It was < 2  years for 43 joints and < 6  months for 19 joints. Six patients underwent arthroplasty while still on SA treatment. One-stage arthroplasty was done for 43 joints and two-stage arthroplasty for 6 joints. Eight (16 %) cultures of intraoperative specimens were positive. Median durations of postoperative antibiotic therapy were 10 d for sterile cultures and 82 d for those that were positive. At 2 years, infection-free survival rate was 95.9 % ( ± 0.02 ). After a median follow-up of 47 [18-142] months, no SA relapse was observed, but five patients developed new periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) with a different microorganism. Conclusion: Arthroplasty may be a post-SA option, even within a short period of time. One-stage arthroplasty can be done if synovectomy is thorough, intraoperative samples are taken and antibiotics are administered until those culture results become available. We observed no SA relapse, but new PJIs occurred.

Successive new-pathogen prosthetic joint reinfections: Observational cohort study on 61 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment failure may be due to relapsing infection (same microorganism) or new-pathogen reinfection (npPJI). The aim was to describe npPJI epidemiological, clinical and microbiological characteristics, their treatments and outcomes, and identify their risk factors. METHODS: This observational, single-center, cohort study was conducted in a French Referral Center for Bone-and-Joint Infections between September 2004 and December 2015. Patients treated for at least two successive hip or knee PJIs in the same joint with a different pathogen were identified in the prospective database. We compared each patient's first PJI and subsequent npPJI(s) to analyze the type and microbiological characteristics of npPJIs. To search for npPJI risk factors, we compared those cases to a random selection of 122 "unique-episode" PJIs treated during the study period. RESULTS: Among 990 PJIs, 79 (8%) npPJIs occurring in 61 patients were included. New-pathogen prosthetic joint infections (npPJIs) developed more frequently in knee (14%) than hip prostheses (5%). Median interval from the first PJI to the npPJI was 26 months. New-pathogen prosthetic joint reinfections (npPJIs) more frequently spread hematogenously (60% vs 33%) and were predominantly caused by Staphylococcus (36%) or Streptococcus (33%) species. Multivariate analysis identified two risk factors: chronic dermatitis (odds ratio: 6.23; P<0.05) and cardiovascular diseases (odds ratio: 2.71; P<0.01). A curative strategy was applied to 70%: DAIR (29%), one-stage (28%), two-stage exchange arthroplasty (7%) or other strategies (7%). The others received prolonged suppressive antibiotic therapy (30%). CONCLUSIONS: New-pathogen prosthetic joint infections (npPJIs) are complex infections requiring management by multidisciplinary teams that should be adapted to each clinical situation.

Outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with primary systemic vasculitis or polymyalgia rheumatica from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician registry: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with primary systemic vasculitis or polymyalgia rheumatica might be at a high risk for poor COVID-19 outcomes due to the treatments used, the potential organ damage cause by primary systemic vasculitis, and the demographic factors associated with these conditions. We therefore aimed to investigate factors associated with COVID-19 outcomes in patients with primary systemic vasculitis or polymyalgia rheumatica. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 12, 2020, and April 12, 2021, who had a history of primary systemic vasculitis (antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody [ANCA]-associated vasculitis, giant cell arteritis, Behçet's syndrome, or other vasculitis) or polymyalgia rheumatica, and were reported to the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registry were included. To assess COVID-19 outcomes in patients, we used an ordinal COVID-19 severity scale, defined as: (1) no hospitalisation; (2) hospitalisation without supplemental oxygen; (3) hospitalisation with any supplemental oxygen or ventilation; or (4) death. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs), adjusting for age, sex, time period, number of comorbidities, smoking status, obesity, glucocorticoid use, disease activity, region, and medication category. Analyses were also stratified by type of rheumatic disease. FINDINGS: Of 1202 eligible patients identified in the registry, 733 (61·0%) were women and 469 (39·0%) were men, and their mean age was 63·8 years (SD 17·1). A total of 374 (31·1%) patients had polymyalgia rheumatica, 353 (29·4%) had ANCA-associated vasculitis, 183 (15·2%) had giant cell arteritis, 112 (9·3%) had Behçet's syndrome, and 180 (15·0%) had other vasculitis. Of 1020 (84·9%) patients with outcome data, 512 (50·2%) were not hospitalised, 114 (11·2%) were hospitalised and did not receive supplemental oxygen, 239 (23·4%) were hospitalised and received ventilation or supplemental oxygen, and 155 (15·2%) died. A higher odds of poor COVID-19 outcomes were observed in patients who were older (per each additional decade of life OR 1·44 [95% CI 1·31-1·57]), were male compared with female (1·38 [1·05-1·80]), had more comorbidities (per each additional comorbidity 1·39 [1·23-1·58]), were taking 10 mg/day or more of prednisolone compared with none (2·14 [1·50-3·04]), or had moderate, or high or severe disease activity compared with those who had disease remission or low disease activity (2·12 [1·49-3·02]). Risk factors varied among different disease subtypes. INTERPRETATION: Among patients with primary systemic vasculitis and polymyalgia rheumatica, severe COVID-19 outcomes were associated with variable and largely unmodifiable risk factors, such as age, sex, and number of comorbidities, as well as treatments, including high-dose glucocorticoids. Our results could be used to inform mitigation strategies for patients with these diseases. FUNDING: American College of Rheumatology and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology.

COVID-19 outcomes in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases treated with rituximab: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Various observations have suggested that the course of COVID-19 might be less favourable in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases receiving rituximab compared with those not receiving rituximab. We aimed to investigate whether treatment with rituximab is associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. METHODS: In this cohort study, we analysed data from the French RMD COVID-19 cohort, which included patients aged 18 years or older with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19. The primary endpoint was the severity of COVID-19 in patients treated with rituximab (rituximab group) compared with patients who did not receive rituximab (no rituximab group). Severe disease was defined as that requiring admission to an intensive care unit or leading to death. Secondary objectives were to analyse deaths and duration of hospital stay. The inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score method was used to adjust for potential confounding factors (age, sex, arterial hypertension, diabetes, smoking status, body-mass index, interstitial lung disease, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, corticosteroid use, chronic renal failure, and the underlying disease [rheumatoid arthritis vs others]). Odds ratios and hazard ratios and their 95% CIs were calculated as effect size, by dividing the two population mean differences by their SD. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04353609. FINDINGS: Between April 15, 2020, and Nov 20, 2020, data were collected for 1090 patients (mean age 55·2 years [SD 16·4]); 734 (67%) were female and 356 (33%) were male. Of the 1090 patients, 137 (13%) developed severe COVID-19 and 89 (8%) died. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, severe disease was observed more frequently (effect size 3·26, 95% CI 1·66-6·40, p=0·0006) and the duration of hospital stay was markedly longer (0·62, 0·46-0·85, p=0·0024) in the 63 patients in the rituximab group than in the 1027 patients in the no rituximab group. 13 (21%) of 63 patients in the rituximab group died compared with 76 (7%) of 1027 patients in the no rituximab group, but the adjusted risk of death was not significantly increased in the rituximab group (effect size 1·32, 95% CI 0·55-3·19, p=0·53). INTERPRETATION: Rituximab therapy is associated with more severe COVID-19. Rituximab will have to be prescribed with particular caution in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. FUNDING: None.

Factors influencing the use of tocilizumab as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real-life setting: results at 1†year of the ACT-SOLO study.

INTRODUCTION: Using a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) as monotherapy in clinical practice for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is common and recognised by health authorities although current guidelines recommend to combine them with conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs. This study mainly aimed to search for real-life factors influencing the use of tocilizumab as MONO or in combination (COMBO). METHODS: In this non-interventional, prospective, national, multicentre study, data were collected every 3 months over a 12-month period in RA patients starting tocilizumab. The proportion of monotherapy patients was described, together with significant explicative factors. RESULTS: Among the 577 analysed patients recruited from January 2012 to August 2013 (228 monotherapy patients; 40%), 79% were women, mean RA duration was 11±9 years, previous RA treatments included bDMARDs and csDMARDs in 75% of cases and mean Disease Activity Score 28 joints-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) was 5.2±1.3 at inclusion. Explicative factors for monotherapy were at least 65 years (OR=1.47, p=0.0485), no methotrexate within the two last years (OR=5.96, p<0.0001), past severe infection (OR=1.99, p=0.0272) and higher baseline DAS28-ESR (OR=1.22, p=0.0086). Regarding clinical results (DAS28-ESR, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) low disease activity and remission; ACR20/50/70 and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response; Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score), no relevant differences between monotherapy and combination patients were observed at 1 year. A total of 23 tocilizumab-treated patients (4%) experienced serious infections; no new safety signals were noted with no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: ACT-SOLO confirms the high proportion of RA patients receiving tocilizumab as MONO in clinical practice. The study also showed that clinical results at 1 year were similar between MONO and COMBO patients in a real-life setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01474291.

Crystal-induced arthritis after arthroplasty: 7 cases.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the occurrence in prosthetic joints of crystal-induced arthritis (CIA) defined as the deposition within the synovial membrane and/or joint cavity of calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate (CPPD) (chondrocalcinosis), sodium urate (gout), or hydroxyapatite. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the 7 cases of prosthetic-joint CIA seen between 1993 and 2013 at a medical-surgical center specialized in the management of osteoarticular infections. RESULTS: The 4 females and 3 males ranged in age from 67 to 79 years. Acute CIA occurred at the knee in 6 patients (5 with total knee arthroplasty and 1 with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty) and at the hip in 1 patient (with total hip arthroplasty). Time from arthroplasty to CIA varied from 7 days to 9 years. An abrupt onset was a consistent feature, with pain, complete loss of function, and local evidence of inflammation. A single patient had a fever and 6 patients had laboratory evidence of systemic inflammation. Joint aspiration showed hemarthrosis in 3 patients and inflammatory joint fluid with 20,000 to 79,000neutrophils/mm(3) in 6 patients. Joint fluid cultures were negative in 6 patients. CPPD crystals were evidenced in 5 patients, including 1 who also had hydroxyapatite crystals detected by electron microscopy after alizarin red staining. Monosodium urate crystals were found in 1 patient. The remaining patient had both CPPD crystals and positive cultures for Campylobacter fetus. In 5 patients, treatment with colchicine or a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug ensured prompt control of the symptoms and systemic inflammation. The patient with total hip arthroplasty underwent joint aspiration for hemarthrosis. In 1 patient, an intraarticular injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide improved the symptoms and systemic inflammation. The patient with Campylobacter fetus infection was treated with antibiotics, excision of the abscess, and synovectomy. CONCLUSION: CIA may occur after arthroplasty, within synovial membrane remains or neosynovium developed around the prosthetic joint. CIA is a manifestation of a metabolic disease that persists and can reactivate after surgery. Routine testing for crystals is rarely performed in patients with sterile arthritis of a prosthetic joint, and crystals are difficult to detect in joints with hemarthrosis; consequently, the frequency of prosthetic-joint CIA may be underestimated. Although rare, CIA should be considered routinely when symptoms suggesting septic arthritis develop in a prosthetic joint, in order to avoid unnecessary prolonged antibiotic therapy and, in some cases, surgery. The treatment is usually simple.

Salmonella typhi osteitis can mimic tuberculosis. A report of three cases.

We report three cases of Salmonella typhi osteitis. One patient was an immunocompetent woman with a single focus of osteitis, another had heterozygous sickle cell disease with multifocal osteitis, and the remaining patient had acute discitis. Tuberculosis was considered in all three patients, based on origin from an endemic area (sub-Saharan Africa), a chronic course in the first two patients, and granulomas in a biopsy specimen from one patient.

Contribution of routine joint aspiration to the diagnosis of infection before hip revision surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To define the sensitivity and specificity of routine preoperative hip aspiration for diagnosing hip prosthesis infection (HPI) and to separately analyze subgroups with and without a clinical suspicion of HPI before aspiration. METHODS: From June 1994 to June 1997, all patients scheduled for hip revision surgery underwent aspiration of the hip under image intensifier guidance. Microbiological results were compared between these preoperative specimens and the intraoperative specimens. The reason for surgery was either a clinical suspicion of HPI or pain suggesting loosening. RESULTS: The study patients had had multiple surgical procedures. HPI was suspected clinically in 39.4% of cases. Of the 109 patients who underwent aspiration, 54 had true-negative results, nine had false-negative results, and 44 had true-positive results (there were no false-positive results), yielding a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 100%. Diagnostic efficiency was 91.6%, positive predictive value was 100%, and negative predictive value was 85.7%. In the subset of 43 patients with a clinical suspicion of HPI, aspiration identified all the causative organisms in 60.5% of cases. Of the 66 patients with no clinical suspicion of HPI, 12 had HPI, and aspiration provided the diagnosis preoperatively in seven of these patients, radically changing their management plans. Restricting routine aspiration to patients whose prosthesis had been implanted within the last 5 years or whose erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was above 30 mm/h would not have modified our findings. CONCLUSIONS: Hip aspiration before revision surgery for pain is effective in detecting HPI, which can simulate aseptic loosening. However, this investigation may be noncontributive in patients who have had their prosthesis for more than 5 years and whose ESR is less than 30 mm/h.

Prognostic value of early computed tomography in radiculopathy due to lumbar intervertebral disk herniation. A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the relationship between the early computerized tomography (CT) features of disk herniation and the clinical outcome in patients with recent-onset sciatic or femoral neuralgia treated conservatively. Early CT is often used, despite the absence of data on usefulness for predicting outcomes. METHODS: Of 78 patients with sciatica or femoral neuralgia of less than 1 month's duration, presumably due to a disk herniation, 75 were found by CT to have a disk herniation at the expected level. All patients were treated conservatively. The 60 patients who were reassessed clinically after 3 months were included in the study. Based on the results of the clinical assessment, the patients were classified as having a good outcome (complete or partial recovery) or a poor outcome. CT findings were compared in these two groups. RESULTS: None of the features of disk herniation studied on the CT scans were significantly correlated with the clinical outcome. A larger herniation or presence of a free fragment was more common in the good outcome group, but the differences were not statistically significant (P= 0.07). CONCLUSION: In this study, early CT scan did not predict the clinical outcome of patients with nerve root pain from lumbar disk herniation. None of the CT criteria was associated with a poor clinical outcome. Early CT scan has no prognostic value in this setting.

Synovial cysts of the proximal tibiofibular joint: three case reports.

Synovial cysts are fluid-filled masses lined with synovium and located within or about joints. The main symptoms are pain and/or neurological deficits. They can be intraneural or extraneural or develop between or within muscles. Synovial cysts that arise at a distance from a joint raise diagnostic challenges. We report three cases of synovial cysts of the proximal tibiofibular joint, including an intramuscular cyst responsible for paralysis of the anterolateral leg muscles. Tibiofibular synovial cysts are less common than popliteal cysts, and their pathophysiology is poorly understood. Pressure on the common peroneal nerve is the main complication and requires careful surgical excision of the cyst. Injection of a glucocorticoid into the cyst can be used as the first-line treatment in patients without common peroneal nerve symptoms.